Cut repetitive tasks, improve MTTR and CSAT, and free your engineers, with a live, self-maintaining map of what each client runs and what breaks when it fails.
Alexus AI
Alexus AI
All resources
Buying guides··8 min read

How to choose NIS2 compliance software for a mid-sized company

There is no single product that makes a company NIS2 compliant. There are three kinds of tool that cover different parts of the law. Here is how to work out which gap you have, and how to choose the software that closes it.

By Abhishek Singh, Founder of Alexus AI, 12+ years building enterprise IT platforms. First published 6 November 2026.

What is the best NIS2 compliance software for a mid-sized company?

The best choice depends on where your gap is, because NIS2 compliance software comes in three kinds that cover different parts of the law. Compliance automation (GRC) platforms manage policies, control checks, supplier questionnaires and the audit workflow. Operational evidence platforms, such as ITSM tools and live dependency maps, hold the records of incidents, changes and assets that several Article 21 measures depend on. Point tools cover one job, such as vulnerability scanning, backup or incident reporting.

Most mid-sized companies need a GRC platform or a well-run ISMS for the policy side, and good operational records for the evidence side. Start by finding which of the two is weaker, then choose software for that gap first. No tool makes a company compliant on its own: NIS2 also requires decisions and oversight by the management body that only people can provide.

What does NIS2 require a mid-sized company to prove?

A medium-sized company in a sector listed in Annex I or II of Directive (EU) 2022/2555 is usually an important entity. Some are essential entities, for example medium-sized providers of public electronic communications networks or entities their Member State designates (Article 3). Our guide does NIS2 apply to me? walks through the test. Either way the core duties are the same:

  • Article 20: the management body approves the cybersecurity risk-management measures, oversees them and follows cybersecurity training.
  • Article 21: ten minimum risk-management measures, from risk analysis and incident handling to supply chain security, cryptography, access control, asset management and MFA. Our guide to the ten Article 21 measures explains each one.
  • Article 23: an early warning within 24 hours of becoming aware of a significant incident, a notification within 72 hours and a final report within one month of the notification. See the Article 23 guide.
  • Registration with the national authority, under the rules your country's transposition sets.

What are the three kinds of NIS2 compliance software?

Vendors below are examples, not recommendations. Each one lists NIS2 on its own website as of November 2026; products change, so confirm details with the vendor.

  • Compliance automation and GRC platforms: they connect to cloud, identity, HR and device tools, run scheduled checks against settings, supply policy templates, track supplier reviews and manage the audit. Examples include Vanta, Drata, Secureframe, Sprinto and Hyperproof, and the Munich-based DataGuard, Kertos and Secfix, which add access to human compliance experts. Most cover ISO/IEC 27001 and SOC 2 as well as NIS2, so controls are shared across frameworks.
  • Operational evidence platforms: the tools where the work is recorded. ITSM suites such as ServiceNow, Jira Service Management and Freshservice hold incident and change records; on-call tools hold incident timelines; observability tools such as Datadog and Dynatrace hold runtime dependencies; and live dependency maps such as Alexus AI reconcile these into an inventory of what you run and what depends on it. They do not manage policies or audits.
  • Point tools: a vulnerability scanner, a backup platform, device management, an identity provider, a security awareness platform. Each produces evidence for one or two measures, and a GRC platform usually reads from them.
  • Trust centre tools, such as Orbiq, sit alongside these: they publish your security documents and status to customers and partners, which helps when your clients ask you, as a supplier, for NIS2 assurance.

Which kind does your company need first?

  • No ISMS yet, and an audit or customer questionnaire coming: a GRC platform with templates, ideally with expert help, gets the policy side in place fastest.
  • An ISO/IEC 27001 programme already running: extend it to NIS2 in the tool you have, then check that the operational records behind Article 21 points (b), (c), (e) and (i) are complete. That is where certified programmes most often have gaps.
  • Policies in good shape, but incident, change or asset records patchy: fix the operational side first, because those records cannot be recreated after the fact. A GRC platform cannot collect what was never recorded.
  • An MSP or a group with several entities: you need evidence per client or per entity, kept separate. Check multi-tenancy before features.

Where does your NIS2 evidence live?

For an EU entity, the location of the compliance tool matters: it holds a detailed map of your weaknesses. Hosting differs between vendors even when the product looks similar. DataGuard says its software is hosted in Germany, Hyperproof runs a separate EU instance in Frankfurt, Vanta offers an EU region that a customer has to request, and Secureframe's data centre outside the US is in the UK. Ask which region your tenant will use, which subprocessors see the data, and what the data processing agreement says about where primary processing happens.

How do you choose NIS2 compliance software? Eight criteria

  • 1. NIS2 coverage you can check: the tool should map its controls to Article 21(2) points (a) to (j), and to the Annex of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 if you are a cloud, data centre, managed service or other digital provider it covers. Ask to see the mapping, not a badge.
  • 2. Evidence from systems, not uploads: count how much of the evidence is read from your systems through integrations and how much someone has to upload. Uploaded documents are fine for policies; they are a weak basis for incidents, changes and assets.
  • 3. Continuous or periodic: find out how often each check runs and whether the tool shows when an item was last confirmed. A setting checked once a quarter tells an auditor little about the other days.
  • 4. Incident reporting: check whether the tool helps you classify an incident against the significance criteria, start the 24-hour and 72-hour clocks and draft the reports in the form your national CSIRT or authority expects.
  • 5. Fit with your stack: list the cloud, identity, ITSM, monitoring and code tools you run, and check each one against the vendor's integration list, including whether the integration is live or planned.
  • 6. Data location and access: where the evidence is stored and processed, whether EU hosting is available, and whether the integrations need write access. Read-only access is enough to collect evidence.
  • 7. Evidence integrity: whether records are tamper-evident and exportable in a form your auditor accepts, with the source and timestamp of each item.
  • 8. Effort to run: who will maintain the tool, how many hours a month it needs, and whether the pricing grows with seats, employees, frameworks or entities. For groups and MSPs, check that each entity or client is kept separate.

What should you ask NIS2 software vendors in a demo?

  • Show me the evidence for Article 21(2)(b), incident handling, for one real incident: where did each record come from?
  • When an integration stops working, what does the dashboard show for the controls that depend on it?
  • Which of the ten Article 21 measures do you cover with collected evidence, which with uploaded documents, and which not at all?
  • How do you handle the Article 23 timeline, and what do the draft reports look like?
  • Where is our data hosted and processed, and which subprocessors do you use?
  • Can we export all our evidence, with sources and timestamps, if we leave?
  • Which customers of our size and sector use the product for NIS2 today, and can we speak to one?
  • What will this cost in year two, when we add entities, users or frameworks?

What should a mid-sized company watch out for?

  • 'NIS2 certified' products. As of November 2026 there is no official NIS2 certification for software. The Commission's January 2026 proposal to amend NIS2 would give cybersecurity certification a role in showing compliance, but it is still going through the legislative process.
  • 'Guaranteed compliance'. Compliance depends on your measures, decisions and oversight, which no vendor controls.
  • Green dashboards with no sources. If you cannot click through to the record behind a pass, an auditor cannot either.
  • Buying for the wrong gap. A GRC platform will not create incident or change records that were never kept, and a monitoring tool will not write your policies.
  • Forgetting national law. NIS2 is a directive, so registration, reporting channels and some details come from your country's transposition. In Ireland, for example, the National Cyber Security Bill that will transpose NIS2 had not been introduced as of November 2026; see NIS2 in Ireland.

How Alexus AI fits

Alexus AI is an operational evidence platform, not a GRC tool. It connects read-only to the cloud, monitoring, ITSM and code tools you already run (status on the connectors page), keeps a live map of what you run and what depends on it, and turns the same data into NIS2 evidence: readiness scored across the ten Article 21 measures with the evidence behind each score, an Article 23 clock with draft reports a person reviews and submits, and a hash-chained audit trail you can verify on demand.

It is strongest on incident, change and asset evidence, and it sits beside a GRC platform rather than replacing one: policies, risk decisions, training records and supplier questionnaires stay there. Identity provider connectors are on the roadmap. The same data also produces DORA and SOC 2 evidence, such as draft reports for major ICT-related incidents, a register of information pre-fill and a SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria mapping. Alexus AI is early-stage, built in Dublin and EU-hosted, and working with design partners. The comparison page sets out where other approaches are stronger, and pricing is per managed client for MSPs and by scope for IT teams. This guide is general guidance, not legal advice.

Frequently asked questions

Do we need NIS2 compliance software at all?
NIS2 does not require any particular tool. A small, well-organised team can meet it with a documented ISMS, good ITSM records and spreadsheets for a while. Software starts paying for itself when evidence has to be gathered from many systems, kept current and shown to an auditor or regulator on request, or when you manage several frameworks, entities or clients at once.
Is a GRC platform enough for NIS2?
It covers a large part: policies, control checks across cloud and identity, supplier management and the audit workflow. What it usually cannot supply is the operational record that some measures depend on, such as complete incident timelines, change approvals and an inventory of what each service depends on. If those records are weak, fix how they are kept in your ITSM, monitoring or dependency mapping tools as well.
Can one tool cover NIS2, ISO 27001 and DORA?
Several compliance automation platforms support many frameworks and map shared controls across them, so evidence collected once counts towards each. Check how deep each framework goes: DORA, for example, adds a register of information on ICT third-party arrangements and resilience testing that general frameworks do not cover. For financial entities, DORA applies instead of NIS2 where its requirements are at least equivalent.
How much does NIS2 compliance software cost?
Prices vary widely and most vendors quote on request. Compliance automation platforms usually price by company size, number of frameworks or modules; operational platforms often price by scope, such as services, nodes or managed clients. Ask for the year-two price with your expected growth, and add the internal time to run the tool, which is often the larger cost for a mid-sized team.
Which NIS2 software is best for an MSP?
An MSP needs two things a single company does not: evidence per client, with each client's data kept separate, and a way to answer the supplier questions its regulated clients will send. Check that the tool is built for many tenants, prices per client rather than per seat, and can produce a separate evidence pack per client. Our guide to NIS2 for MSPs lists what clients will ask for.

Sources

Make NIS2 evidence a query, not a project

Alexus AI keeps a live map of what you run and turns it into Article 21 readiness, Article 23 report drafts and a hash-chained audit trail.

Keep reading

Buying guides

ServiceNow CMDB alternatives for mid-market IT teams and MSPs

Fundamentals

What is NIS2? A plain-English guide to the EU directive

Ireland

NIS2 in Ireland: who it covers, who regulates it, what to do now